Sunday, 23 September 2012

Prison manpower

British Justice Secretary Ken Clarke recently decided that the “feral underclass” overcrowding the country’s prisons should “get off their beds and into purposeful activity”. Prisoners are a wasted resource, he says, “thousands of hours of manpower lying idle,” and they should be working 40 hours a week. In short, prisons are not “delivering as they should”.



So, how should prisons deliver?
The prisoner-employment initiative was pioneered in the UK by shoe-repair and key-cutting chain Timpsons, which trains and employs prisoners in its shops. Other jobs done by prisoners include  construction, sewing, farm, welding, plastering, motor mechanics, printing, manufacture of military equipment, and training guide dogs. Much of the work for the prison itself which would otherwise have to be outsourced to private contractors, such as making prison furniture and uniforms, can be done by inmates.

Why should prisoners work?
Part of the rationale for obliging prisoners to work is that it helps instil a work ethic in them. It gets them into the routine of getting up every morning, putting in a day of productivity, and feeling they have achieved something at the end of the day. This stands them in good stead when they leave prison, because they are more likely to find a job (especially if they have learnt new skills as part of their work) and keep it, and less likely to return to a life of crime.

The system is working well at one prison where all inmates work and also have access to courses such as motor mechanics and literacy. 57% of them go into employment or further training or education after their release, which is 70% higher than the national average.

Working in prison also keeps prisoners occupied. As a prison official, you do not want bored inmates, because they will be tempted to fill their time by causing disruption. (For the same reason, prison officials and sociologists criticised the prohibition on weights in many US prisons. Weights were banned because muscly prisoners make guards nervous and because weights can be used as weapons. However, in practice, weight-lifting gives inmates something to do and keeps them out of trouble.)


So having prisoners work is good for the prisoners and good for society. But it is also good for employers. This site puts it best:

“For business moguls who have participated in prison labor schemes, it is like they continuously hit the lottery. The workers are unable to strike, there is no need to pay unemployment insurance. There is no need to cover vacation pay or workman's compensation bills. The workers pull full-time shifts, they never arrive late for work. They also never call in absent due to family emergencies. Even better than all this is that if the workers are not happy with their twenty five cents an hour, they can be locked up in secluded cells.”

But on the other hand…
But wait! the cry goes up. We are in the depths of a recession. Well-behaved, law-abiding, highly qualified citizens desperate to work can’t find employment – and yet prisoners are to be handed jobs on a silver platter! Employment is a privilege, and being in prison is – or should be – about having privileges taken away. Especially if the privilege deprives somebody else of a job – somebody whose taxes are going towards prisoners’ upkeep.

Prison labour is also a form of exploitation. In the words of US academics Steve Fraser and Joshua Freeman, “Rarely can you find workers so pliable, easy to control, stripped of political rights, and subject to martial discipline at the first sign of recalcitrance.”


THE WAGE ISSUE

Should working prisoners be paid market wages?
Currently prisoners are paid only a fraction of the usual going rate, sometimes as little as£0.40 per hour. (The national minimum wage is £6.08 per hour).

Advantages of paying prisoners at market rate
One concern about paying these low wages is that it does little to demonstrate the value of work. How motivated would you be to work if you were earning 6% of the minimum wage? Paying prisoners properly helps instill in them an understanding of the satisfaction and usefulness of earning their own money, and inspires them to look for employment after being released rather than turning back to crime to survive.

As one vociferous politician whose name I cannot recall vented so eloquently on the radio, “Many of these people are in prison because they’ve never worked a day in their lives. And if they work in prison and get paid miserably, they will see that they were right not to work!”

In addition, proper wages will help a prisoner support his family while he is in prison and to save up so that does not become a burden on the taxpayer when he is released and is setting up a new life.

Insisting on market wages for prisoners also helps protect other workers and job-seekers, since employers often favour the cheap labour of prisoners over the market-rate labour of law-abiding citizens. (Some companies have brought their outsourced services back from India to the UK to be done by prisoners, and some have even fired their own workers or pressurised them to quit to make way for prisoners.) 


But on the other hand…
As mentioned above, employment itself is a privilege, and good wages even more so. If you have broken the law, why should you be rewarded for it by being given a well-paid job?

GMB union leader Paul Kenny’s take on the matter is: “Ken Clarke has taken leave of his senses. There are 2 million people on the dole looking for work and the idea of bypassing them and undermining the national minimum wage is frankly ludicrous and unacceptable.” 

One solution to the wage issue
One way round the problem is to pay prisoners market wages, but allow them access to only a fraction of the money while they are serving their sentence. The rest can be set aside for when they are released.


Is prison life really as good as Ken Clarke would have us believe?
I was once talking to someone who had worked in a British prison, and he painted a picture of a fairly luxurious place: TV, gym facilities, a library, very few responsibilities.
“But what’s the punishment then?” I asked.
“The punishment,” he informed me gravely, “is the complete loss of liberty. You’re trapped there.”

Final thought
One thing that strikes me is that it is easy to draw an “Us and Them” line between prisoners and the general population. “They’re not like us,” we tell ourselves. “They’re a different type of person.” But they’re not. You don’t have to be a particular type of person to go to prison. It can happen to anyone, including you.

Here are some of the ways you too could become a prisoner:

For up to 2 years imprisonment:
Falsely describing or presenting food
Making off without payment

Up to 3 years:
Presentation of an obscene performance of a play

Up to 5 years:
Abstracting of electricity

Up to 7 years:
False accounting
Insider trading
Communicating false information alleging the presence of bombs
Placing or dispatching articles to cause a bomb hoax
Bigamy

Up to 10 years:
Making threats to kill

Up to 14 years:
Fraudulently printing, mutilating or re-issuing stamps

Life:
Offences which amount to the crime of piracy under the Piracy Acts 1698 and 1721
And finally – and I can’t believe this actually happens – impeding a person endeavouring to save himself from shipwreck

Now just tell me you’ve never at least thought about doing one of the acts above. And if you really haven’t, then I bet you know somebody who has. Just the other day a friend of mine “made off without payment”. She walked out of the hairdresser’s salon completely forgetting to pay for her cut and blowdry. (She phoned the hairdresser later when she realised it. “Why didn’t you say anything?” she asked. “I didn’t know what to say,” he replied. Quite.) Or “an obscene performance of a play”. I saw a performance of Shakespeare’s Tempest once where the actress playing Ariel was topless throughout. And I myself regularly “falsely describe or present food” (“It’s supposed to be that colour. Eat it.”)

You’re just lucky because you’ve never been caught for doing these deviant things. But next time you might be. And then you could become a prisoner too, and that “Us and Them” line will not seem quite so substantial anymore.

I leave you with the immortal words from the film Blow, the story of George Jung, cocaine smuggler, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence:


SOURCES
http://weeklywire.com/ww/04-24-00/boston_feature_2.html

Sunday, 2 September 2012

In search of the anti-rabbit

While working on a translation the other day, I happened to need to know what preposition the verb “to be constituted” takes (and don’t sit there looking so smug: do you know what preposition it takes?). Google, normally the fount of all knowledge, was uncharacteristically unhelpful with the matter, so I turned to the European Union’s online multilingual dictionary, IATE, where I typed in “costituito” (the Italian term that had thrown me) and got the shock of my life to be faced with this:

Chimica []Voce completa
IT
coniugato costituito da immunoglobulina anti-coniglio e isotiocianato di fluoresceina
FITC
EN
FITC
fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-rabbit immunoglobulin conjugate

In the midst of this lexical kaleidoscope, the only words that really swam into focus were “anti-rabbit”. So I decided to work with what I had and googled anti-rabbit. It turns out to be a term from the field of antibodies. And I was left well and truly speechless to discover, fourteen and a half million results later, that antibodies can be not only anti-rabbit but also anti-goat, anti-horse, anti-mouse, anti-rat, anti-sheep, anti-pig, anti-chicken, anti-donkey, anti-guinea-pig, anti-hamster and anti-cow (which is actually properly called anti-bovine). 

And it gets worse. Antibodies can also be goat anti-mouse, chicken anti-rat, donkey anti-pig, and all manner of startling combinations of animals.

But what does it all mean?
  
1)      Let’s start with immunoglobulin, which is another word for antibody.
An antibody (or immunoglobulin if you prefer) is a type of protein which functions within the immune system to identify and neutralise antigens.  They are produced by plasma cells, a type of white blood cell.

2)      What is an antigen?
An antigen is a foreign body which an antibody attacks.  Examples of antigens are microorganisms (e.g. bacteria, viruses, funghi and parasites), pollen, chemicals, bacterial toxins and tissue cells.

3)      What does an antibody look like?
An antibody looks like this:
but for the sake of comprehension, we will picture it like this:


It is made up of two heavy polypeptide chains (blue) and two light ones (pink) arranged in a Y shape.  For the most part, antibodies are all the same except for the tips of the Y (the light areas in the picture). These tips are the antigen binding sites – the parts of the antibody which attach themselves to the antigen, and they differ according to which antigen they bind to.

4)      What does an antibody do to an antigen?
An antibody has various methods of attack:

a)      Opsonisation
The antibody recognises and attaches itself to an antigen, then releases a chemical signal to attract phagocytic (devouring) cells to consume it.

b)      Neutralisation
Sometimes the antibody also neutralises the antigen directly by attaching itself to the part of the antigen that is used to cause infection, rendering it useless.

c)       Complement activation
The antibody calls phagocytic cells, and while it waits for them to arrive, it activates complement, a chain of proteins which helps destroy infected cells.

d)      Agglutination
Having two branches in its Y shape, the antibody can bind to two antigens.  So an antibody can join two antigens together, then another antibody can join another antigen to them, and so on, until a clump is formed. This clump becomes cumbersome and vulnerable to phagocytes.

An animation of neutralisation and opsonisation:


5)      Isn’t that amazing?
It is – when it works. But sometimes it doesn’t. Some immune disorders, for example, prevent the immune system producing the right antibodies or enough of them. Or with cancer, your immune system may not recognise the cancer cells as dangerous, because they are relatively similar to your body cells. Alternatively, it may recognise them as foreign but not be strong enough to fight them, or the immune system’s activity might be limited by substances given off by the cancer cells.

6)      Are we getting to the rabbits now?
Yes. Cases such as those described above can be treated by introducing foreign antibodies into the body. These antibodies are created in a laboratory by injecting animals with the antigen in question, inducing them to produce the appropriate antibodies. Mice are the animals most frequently used, but rabbits – and indeed goats, horses, rats, sheep, pigs, chickens, donkeys, guinea pigs, hamsters and cows – can also be used.

This is a clever idea in theory, but in practice, your body sometimes feels threatened by these foreign antibodies, and manufactures its own antibodies to attack them, producing an allergic reaction which can range from a rash to renal failure. These antibodies which you produce are called anti-mouse antibodies (or anti-rabbit or anti-chicken, or anti- whatever the animal in question is). And because you are human, they are called human anti-mouse (or human anti-chicken etc) antibodies. If you were a goat, the result would be goat anti-mouse antibodies. You get the idea.

Animals in our systems are not as infrequent as you might think. It is estimated that at least 10% of the general population carries some form of animal-derived antibodies, due to the widespread use of medicines manufactured using animal sera.

7)      Now we need to deal with fluorescein isothiocyanate. Stay with me…
Fluorescein is a dye which glows (“to fluoresce” means “to glow”), and it is used as a tracer (being introduced into a body or other system so that its distribution can be followed).

Isothiocyanates are a family of organic compounds, which are found in nature in certain strongly-flavoured vegetables such as horseradish and onions. (“Iso”=similar, “thio”=sulphur, “cyanate”=salt or ester of cyanic acid)These compounds can be synthesised, however, from, among other things, the fluorescein mentioned above.

Fluorescein isothiocyanate – the organic compound synthesised from fluorescein – is used to label and track cells, so that they can be identified under a microscope. It can be conjugated (connected) to antibodies, which help target specific proteins or structures (remember, antibodies are all about targeting: watch the video above again if you don’t remember).

8)      So in summary:
Fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-rabbit immunoglobulin conjugate need scare us no longer. We now know that it is an organic compound (isothiocyanate) derived from a fluorescing dye (fluorescein), connected (conjugated) to an antibody (immunoglobulin) which fights antibodies produced in rabbits (anti-rabbit).

9)      Where can I get it?
From Sigma Aldrich, purveyors of chemical and biochemical products. They advise you to store your fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-rabbit immunoglobulin conjugate as follows:

For continuous use, store at 2-8 °C for up to one month. For extended storage, the solution may be frozen in working aliquots.  Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended.  Storage in "frost-free" freezers is not recommended.  If slight turbidity occurs upon prolonged storage, clarify the solution by centrifugation before use.

10)   And since you were probably wondering…
“Constituted by” and “constituted of” both exist. I went for “by” on this occasion.

SOURCES